Saturday too

12.  Explanation for these blog tactics

The aim below is to mix topics in a generic post to bury the core data – on OoL, I’ll spell it out more plainly. Also, poor attribution must kick in here to protect the sources.

11.  Patel and the bureaucrats

This one’s a sleeper, we’ll come back to it.

10.  Constitution

a. The President’s Constitutional Plan.

It involves two steps, or two fronts: First the Courts, then the House.

-The Trump Campaign, RNC, various state GOP Parties, third party organizations, are filing county, state, and federal lawsuits.

A Republic, not a Democracy.

b. -The primary objective is to strategically get several ballots invalidated.

-However, a secondary objective is to publicly expose “corruption” in these cities to both STATE reps and US House and Senate Leaders. This is crucial.

c. -While keeping the 73 million Trump supporters engaged and working behind the scenes.

-There seems to be success in this, as two polls show 60% of the US now believe “fraud” occurred and only 49% believe Biden won. These polls have a 37-32 D:R bias.

d. -Keep in mind, MSM “calls” are merely “projections” of how a state voted in the popular vote. Strictly speaking, they means nothing.

-Win, or lose in court, the next step is the GOP State Legislatures (SLs) in PA, MI, WI, AZ and GA.

A Republican, not a Democracy.

e. -On December 14, 2020, Certified Electors from each state, cast their ballots for the President and VP. What many do not realize is they vote in their home state and their vote is sealed and NOT “counted” until January 6th. Crucial point.

f. -Now, the SLs have the Constitutional authority (under Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 and 3 U.S. Code § 2 and § 5) to appoint their own slate of Electors, loyal to President Trump, if they deem their state’s “POPULAR VOTE IS CORRUPTED”.

g. -In other words, the State GOP Legislature of Georgia, for example, can “conclude that the popular vote has been corrupted” and appoint a “competing slate” of electors, loyal to President Trump. For example, 20 Biden Electors from PA & 20 for Trump.

A Republic, not a Democracy.

h. -The precedent for this is the 1876 Election when SC, LA, FL and (1 EV from OR) each sent competing Dem and Repub Electoral votes, sealed, to the archivist in D.C.

-Keep in mind, NOTHING is “counted” yet. Another crucial point.

i. -On January 6, the 12th Amendment to the Constitution specifies that the “President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted.”

j. -That means that in the case of disputes about competing electoral slates, the President of the Senate—Vice President Pence—would appear to have the ultimate authority to decide which to accept and which to reject. This is supported by 3 U.S. Code § 15. Hence, Trump wins.

k. -This is a de facto check on the Electoral College, which few realize because it only happened in 1876.

A Republic, not a Democracy.

l. -If at that point, nobody gets to 270, the 12th Amendment stipulates, “the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote.”

m. -Currently, Republicans have a state delegation majority with 26 (likely 30 in the new Congress) out of 50. Ergo, Trump wins.

-Prez Trump has clearly discussed and been briefed on a strategy to contest the election via Constitutional means, first through the courts and then…

n. …through House, saying at a Sept. 26 rally in—where else—Pennsylvania: “And I don’t want to end up in the Supreme Court and I don’t want to go back to Congress either, even though we have an advantage if we go back to Congress — does everyone understand that? I think it’s….

o. …26 to 22 or something because it’s counted one vote per state, so we actually have an advantage. Oh, they’re going to be thrilled to hear that.”

NO clearer indication exists that this was his plan all along.

p. -Moreover, Politico reports, “In private, Trump has discussed the possibility of the presidential race being thrown into the House as well, raising the issue with GOP lawmakers, according to Republican sources” such as McConnell, Graham, McCarthy, etc.

q. -This would explain Sen. McConnell’s resolute backing of President Trump. It is clear, McConnell, who is shrewd and believes in raw power, knows POTUS is on solid Constitutional ground. With our help, he will hold the GOP Caucus in line.

r. – In a contested 2020 election, like the Election of 1876, the Republican Senate and Democratic House would disagree on which electors to accept. This is called a “disputation.”

A Republic, not a Democracy.

s. -Under the Constitution, there exists no mechanism to resolve a dispute in which the two houses of Congress cannot agree upon a certified set of electors, and there is no Constitutional role for the courts, including the Supreme Court. This is another crucial point.

t. -Hence, Trump’s Sept. 26th references to FIRST the COURTS, then the HOUSE (see above).

-The House and Senate GOP (McCarthy & McConnell) shall argue under the language of the 12th amendment, the President of the Senate—Vice President Mike Pence—has the sole discretion…

u. ….to break a deadlock between the Senate and the House, and to either accept or dismiss disputed electors.

-Republicans will point to the historical pedigree of the VP’s position, observing that the GOP made the same argument during the election of 1876.

v. -Given the language of the Twelfth Amendment, whatever its ambiguity and potential policy objections, there is no other possible single authority to identify for this purpose besides the President of the Senate to act as the arbiter of any disputes and break deadlocks.

w. -In fact, within Pence’s powers, he could either accept the competing slates of electors submitted, or dismiss them as disputed, and not have them counted. A reduced total still delivers Trump a victory BECAUSE IT DEPRIVES BIDEN OF 270. This is another crucial point.

x. -If 270 is not reached, then under the 12th amend, “the House of Representatives shall “choose immediately”, in this scenario, reelecting President Trump to a second term because, as stated above, the GOP controls the House Delegation majority.

A Republic, not a Democracy.

y. So, what we need to do is KEEP CALLING, EMAILING, ORGANIZAING, MARCHING, and FORCING the GOP at the State and Federal levels to appoint a Republican slate of electors for Prez Trump and SUPPORT HIM 1000%.

End.

z. Addendum Trump’s Constitutional Plan (See above):

-Dec. 14 the Electoral College votes, but on January 6, is when it is “counted”.
-If one member of the House and one Senator dispute or “object” an electoral vote, or a state slate, both houses withdraw to debate the issue.

-Now, 3 U.S.C. § 6 says “if there is “controversy” re an election, then the governor must, “as soon as practicable after such determination,” communicate, “under the seal of the State…a certificate of such determination in form and manner as the same shall have been made.”

-This suggests that, if a governor is ignoring controversy, or a contested election result and not issuing a determination, and communicating it properly, s/he is breaking federal law.

-I believe this too is where objections re “certified” state electors will arise on Jan 6.

-For example, the GA, AZ, and PA results, will likely disputed by the Senate (R) because the govs of those states are AWOL, ignoring pleases for audits. Thus, their states’ results will be challenged as “unlawfully certified”.

-This will be resisted by the Dem House.

-Now, under the Electoral Count Act of 1877, it is unclear if the House accepts a slate and the Senate rejects it, how to move beyond an impasse. What is clear is that tradition holds “The President of the Senate” is the tie breaker. Ergo, Trump wins.

9.  Priorities

8.  Powell

a. It is now becoming clearer what Sidney Powell’s focus is.

Remember, Powell is likely unable to reveal all (even if she wants to). She is a lawyer acting on client instructions. Not just that, I suspect that the evidence she has access to is classified at the highest level.

But we know that Powell has seen evidence that has STUNNED her. Perhaps even frightened her. It’s obvious by her demeanor and speech.

Powell is trying her best to give us more information:

https://mobile.twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1329933438691008512

b. I have been concerned that Powell’s main piece of evidence is an affidavit from a Chavez senior military officer.

Powell keeps referring to it as ‘smoking hot’. My opinion has been ‘it’s interesting, sure. But if that is all she has, it doesn’t prove anything in 2020. Why is Sidney going on and on about it?’

The tweet above answers my question. I think Powell is indicating that COMBINED WITH OTHER EVIDENCE, the affidavit becomes RED HOT.

What other evidence? Check out Powell’s tweet.

c. Powell refers to Title 50 for the first time.

Title 50 (below) is a sprawling piece of legislation defining what POTUS can and can’t do when the US is at war, or in a national emergency.

For example, Trump’s EO 13848 was ordered under T 50.

Anyway, what I think Powell is pointing us towards is that there is a national emergency in place and that Title 50 covert operations are occurring behind the scenes.

There’s a LOT MORE happening than any of us know.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50

d. EVERYONE should listen to Powell’s interview with Howie Carr (1.30-1.44).

It is STUNNING.

A few days ago, Powell was referring only to election fraud using tech in Venezuela.

Now she is referring to the use of this technology in the 2016 US Democratic primaries, the 2016 election as well as elections in different countries overseas.

In addition, Powell alleges that there was interference from China, Iran, Serbia and Lichtenstein in the 2020 election.

Not just that.

e. Apart from Trump, Powell specifically IDs John James and Leon Benjamin being targeted.

There are 10 MILLION + fraudulent votes for Biden.

She says that data suggests MILLIONS OF DEAD people voted.

She has CHEQUE STUBS of people who paid to get others to harvest ballots.

She has direct evidence of something called ‘dragon drop’ which allows an operator at a computer to make (Trump) votes disappear.

Powell says that the evidence she has is ‘TERRIFYING’.

There’s more.

f. Powell refers to her evidence including direct proof of mail in ballot fraud – multiple entries of the same ballot, pristine ballots.

And VERY interesting indeed – an intercepted ‘call’ with ‘hundreds’ of people where a Department of Defense official instructs them (including Bernie Sanders) how to commit ‘sabotage’ in their offices.

g. There’s apparently evidence of a transcripted call by Dominion’s Eric Coomer admitting he has made sure Trump has lost. Oh – Coomer has DISAPPEARED.

Dominion have closed their offices. Hundreds of their employees are erasing their presence from the web.

Powell can’t prove it but she thinks CIA is involved and that Haspel should be fired.

And more.

The point being that even if half of what Powell is disclosing is true, we are talking about an emerging scandal of historic proportions.

h. Easily the worst crime in US history.

But as Powell says, it’s also a GLOBAL scandal.

This is the best interview Powell has done. She speaks with confidence, is calm and refers to specific evidence where she can. But you can hear the alarm in her voice.

Powell is extremely worried at what she has seen. And ANGRY.

[H/T Chuckles, haiku, Rossa’s mother, DR and so on where applicable]

11 comments for “Saturday too

  1. As you say if even half of what she is saying is true they’ll be writing books about this for the next 20 years. The best evidence I’ve seen thus far is real-time video from folk who recorded the results coming in and you can see on screen votes being transferred from Trump to Biden.

  2. Are the media finally waking up?
    I hope this one wins, couldn’t happen to a more deserving person.
    https://www.express (DOT)co(DOT)uk/news/world/1362945/Donald-Trump-latest-news-US-election-result-2020-Facebook-Mark-Zuckerberg-legal-challenge

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.