Reason for spending an inordinate amount of time on her is her proximity to the presidency and her ‘chancer’ nature [bonking a mayor to advance her agenda], her ruthlessness [the delight with which she tried to destroy Kavanaugh and family, also the nature of her statement in June in part one], her utter lack of decency – all that we know. Her associations:
Of course Alexander Soros is congratulating Kamala Harris.
Any questions? https://t.co/Jw0zzIevxD
— Haley Kennington (@kenningtonsays) August 11, 2020
In fact, we can’t imagine anyone voting for her – blacks don’t seem to like her, she was taken apart by Gabbard in a debate, which showed they were feeding Gabbard the questions at that point, rather than her. If all this is so from our position in the race, then how does one explain this?
Major point there is the likes. Forget the retweets as they can include enemies as well, but likes don’t. How to explain the likes?
First immediate idea is that Dorsey cranked them up. But that’s dishonest, say the pure. Yes – and what’s pure in this campaign?
Second explanation is that once someone’s endorsed, even those opposed within the party swing over to that person.
Third is that she is actually popular, despite our claims otherwise. Or to put it in a WC Fields way – he never votes for, he always votes against.
Fourth is that, in the minds of that side, she represents, meaning she does not have to be good in herself – nobody cared about Lewinski – she represents blacks in their minds, because they’re told she does – that link to blackvoices, by the way, was lost in a late night screenshot before zonking into erehwon.
DemRat voters think of her as masterful in dealing with a rapist in Kavanaugh as they see it, see her as fun and lighthearted when necessary but can be serious and businesslike when needed – they point to her position in California and all the wonderful things she said she did.
Any moral questioning of Harris and they tout their version of Trump they’ve never challenged in their minds. Never mind facts, charges not proven, Orange-Man-Out is all they can think of.
CNN also put this:
Bottom line here is that our side stakes all on public decency and ethics to bring her down but these people, the DemRats – they don’t care diddly squat about such things.
Power – that is the only criterion. The game. Oh, and to sort out the birth issue:
She’s not African and she’s not really even an American since she’s an anchor baby and both her parents were in the United States illegally when they had her. She should have had Indian citizenship.
Again the question – was she born in California, Obama in Hawaii … or elsewhere? Any documents to the effect are pretty well worthless in a high stakes game like this. More on this:
Neither parent was an American. The Federalist Papers and the courts have been very clear in this. This would be tied up in the courts under a challenge of the 14th Amendment and would have to overturn precedent.
At least Obama had one parent who was an American. Also, since her dad is Jamaican, Kamala is a dual citizen under Jamaican law.
Bottom line is it would be sorted out by SCOTUS and guess who’s in charge of SCOTUS? Roberts!
Another reader writes:
Look how many incompetent black people have been put in positions of power throughout the country–DAs, mayors, police chiefs, administrators, etc. I don’t think this country has learned anything about the dangers of choosing incompetent people for jobs based on skin color, and I say this as a non-white person.